Pring v. Social Security, Commissioner of
| Matthew John Pring and Matthew J. Pring |
| Social Security, Commissioner of and Commissioner of Social Security |
| Kansas City Region Social Security Administration |
| 1:2024cv00328 |
| March 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Phillip J Green |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Sarah E. Preston on behalf of defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Preston, Sarah) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis; signed by Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green (jkw)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE regarding transmission of complaint, service and answer; that this case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green (slk) |
| SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendant Commissioner of Social Security (not needed for this type of case) (slk) |
| Filing 3 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by plaintiff Matthew John Pring (Rinck, James) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Rinck, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Matthew J. Pring (Rinck, James) Modified text on 4/1/2024 (slk). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
