Sleep Doctor, LLC v. Sleep Doctor Holdings, LLC et al
Sleep Doctor, LLC |
Sleep Doctor Holdings, LLC, The Sleep Doctor, LLC, Bill Fish and Michael Breus |
1:2024cv00350 |
April 5, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Robert J Jonker |
Ray Kent |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 REPORT from the Clerk, WDMI, to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on the filing of a TRADEMARK ACTION (mlc) |
Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned to Robert J. Jonker ; with NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re corporate disclosure statement (mlc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sleep Doctor Holdings, LLC, The Sleep Doctor, LLC, Bill Fish, Michael Breus filed by Sleep Doctor, LLC, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M) (Gibson, Regan) Modified text on 4/5/2024 (mlc) |
SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendants Michael Breus, Bill Fish, Sleep Doctor Holdings, LLC, The Sleep Doctor, LLC (No Summons Provided) (mlc) |
RECEIPT: in the amount of $405.00, receipt number AMIWDC-7339299; filing fee paid by attorney Regan Ann Gibson on behalf of filer (jmw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.