Jennings #213611 v. Bergh et al
2:2006cv00001 |
January 4, 2006 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Northern Division (2) Office |
Magistrate Judge Timothy P. Greeley |
Judge Gordon J. Quist |
Prisoner: Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 49 re 36 : Defendant Berg's motion 36 for summary judgment is GRANTED and summary judgment is granted for Defendants Wickstrom and Hursch; case closed; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt) |
Filing 49 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendant Berg's motion for summary judgment 36 be granted and this case be dismissed in its entirety; objections to R&R due within 10 days; signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy P. Greeley (Magistrate Judge Timothy P. Greeley, cpl) |
Filing 31 OPINION AND ORDER APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 29 re 21 , 16 : Defendants Hursh, Bergh, Rapelje, Jones, Immel, Rife, and Wickstrom's motion for summary judgment 16 is GRANTED and said defendants are DISMISSED; Defendant Berg's motion for summary judgment 21 is DENIED; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jennings #213611 v. Bergh et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.