Carson #193689 v. Riley et al
| Antonio F. Carson #193689 |
| Gerald Riley, Nate Hoffman, Dave Bergh and James Armstrong |
| 2:2007cv00045 |
| March 13, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Northern Division (2) Office |
| Marquette |
| Chief Judge Robert Holmes Bell |
| Magistrate Judge Timothy P. Greeley |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
OPINION ; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb)
|
|
Filing
102
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 69 plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel ; denying 94 plaintiff's motion to allow another prisoner to assist him at trial ; denying 97 and 101 plaintiff's motions to compel; granting 99 plaintiff's motion for exclusion of witnesses ; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb) Modified text on 7/1/2009 (slk).
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 67 , and granting in part and denying part Defendants' motion for summary judgment 58 ; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb)
|
|
Filing
67
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendants' motion for summary judgment 58 be granted in part and denied in part; objections to R&R due within 10 days; signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy P. Greeley (Magistrate Judge Timothy P. Greeley, cpl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
