Stevenson #164199 v. Pramstaller et al
Burvin Stevenson #164199 |
George Pramstaller, Craig Hutchinson, Tricia Clark, Jennifer Granholm, Patricia L. Caruso, Unknown Parties, Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Penny Rodgers, Cher Luxton and K. Hauglie |
2:2008cv00079 |
March 31, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Prisoner: Civil Rights (Prison Condition) Office |
Marquette |
Chief Judge Robert Holmes Bell |
Magistrate Judge Timothy P. Greeley |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 46 , granting Defendants Craig Hutchinson, Correctional Medical Services, Inc., and Penny Rodgers motion to dismiss 32 , and granting Defendants K. Hauglie, George Pramstaller, Jennifer Granhol m, and Patricia L. Caruso's motion for summary judgment 27 . Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Hauglie, Pramstaller, Granholm, and Caruso. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Hutchinson, Correctional Medical Services, Inc., and Rodgers are dismissed without prejudice ; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb) |
Filing 46 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendants motion for summary judgment 27 , and motion to dismiss 32 be granted and this case be dismissed; objections to R&R due within 10 days; signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy P. Greeley (Magistrate Judge Timothy P. Greeley, cpl) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.