Hulvey #257790 v. Quigley et al
Robert Hulvey #257790 |
Unknown Young, Unknown McJouren, Daniel Quigley and Michael Curley |
2:2008cv00237 |
September 22, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Northern Division (2) Office |
Chippewa |
Judge R. Allan Edgar |
Magistrate Judge Timothy P. Greeley |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 89 OPINION ; signed by Judge R. Allan Edgar (EDTN Judge R. Allan Edgar, cam) |
Filing 72 ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 67 re: 52 , 43 , ; signed by Judge R. Allan Edgar (EDTN Judge R. Allan Edgar, cam) |
Filing 67 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendants' motions for summary judgment 52 , 43 be granted in part and that all defendants, with the exception of defendant James Young, be dismissed from this action; objections to R&R due within 10 days; signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy P. Greeley (Magistrate Judge Timothy P. Greeley, cpl) |
Filing 59 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 48 , denying motion 26 ; signed by Judge R. Allan Edgar (EDTN Judge R. Allan Edgar, cam) |
Filing 48 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiff's motion for a declaratory order or injunctive relief 26 be denied; objections to R&R due within 10 days; signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy P. Greeley (Magistrate Judge Timothy P. Greeley, cpl) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.