Quinn v. Pipe & Piping Supplies (U.S.A.), Ltd et al
| Jamie Quinn |
| Pipe & Piping Supplies (U.S.A.), Ltd and Ron Griffith |
| 2:2009cv00161 |
| July 22, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Northern Division (2) Office |
| Chippewa |
| Judge Robert Holmes Bell |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
219
OPINION ; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb)
|
|
Filing
199
OPINION ; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb)
|
|
Filing
165
OPINION ; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb)
|
|
Filing
95
OPINION ; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb)
|
|
Filing
78
OPINION ; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb)
|
|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendant's motion for continuance of trial. Trial is rescheduled from November 1, 2010 to March 23, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. before Hon. Robert Holmes Bell in Marquette, Michigan ; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER vacating and remanding to the magistrate judge for reconsideration, the ruling on Defendants' motions regarding the filing of a counter-complaint; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
