Riddle #180984 et al v. Napel
| Marcel Riddle #180984 and Ryan Cobley #214866 |
| Robert Napel, Barbara S. Sampson, Daniel Heyns, Prison Health Services, James Alexander, Jan Prokasch-Graves, Mike Grant, Chris Lutgens, Joshua Kocha, Ambre Ehle, Jim Michellon and Roger Latitinen |
| 2:2013cv00152 |
| April 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Northern Division (2) Office |
| Marquette |
| Timothy P. Greeley |
| Gordon J. Quist |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 102 re 100 : Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 100 is GRANTED and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; case closed; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 93 re 72 : Defendants Motion 72 for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; Plaintiff claims against Defendants Prokosch-Graves and Kocha are DISMISSED; case to continue against Defendant Napel; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 55 , 69 , 60 , 64 ; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)
|
|
Filing
29
OPINION; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, jmt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
