Jones v. Horton

Petitioner: Matthew W. Jones #960702
Respondent: Connie Horton
Case Number: 2:2019cv00001
Filed: January 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Timothy P Greeley
Referring Judge: Gordon J Quist
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 1, 2019 FILING FEE PAID re #1 by petitioner Matthew W Jones in the amount of $5, receipt number 0646-4327732 (Tieber, F.)
January 1, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for writ of habeas corpus with Brief in Support filed by Matthew W Jones (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - February 9, 2017 Opinion of the Michigan Court of Appeals) (Tieber, F.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Horton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Connie Horton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Matthew W. Jones #960702
Represented By: F. Martin Tieber
Represented By: Kristoffer W. Tieber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?