Moore #960770 v. Sprader

Petitioner: Brenitaze Moore #960770
Respondent: Scott Sprader
Case Number: 2:2019cv00068
Filed: March 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Gordon J Quist
Referring Judge: Maarten Vermaat
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Brenitaze Moore #960770 (Attachments: #1 Appendix A - State of Michigan Opinion and Order, #2 Appendix B - State of Michigan Motion for Relief from Judgment, #3 Appendix C - State of Michigan Memorandum, #4 Appendix D - State of Michigan Grand Jury Felony Indictment with Supreme Court Orders) (mlc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore #960770 v. Sprader
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Scott Sprader
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Brenitaze Moore #960770
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?