Board #766060 v. Smith et al
| Ryan Board #766060 |
| Mike McLean, Bienvenido Canlas, Unknown Part(y)(ies), Jody M. Krause and Unknown Smith |
| 2:2019cv00150 |
| July 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Robert J Jonker |
| Maarten Vermaat |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Copy of Order to Proceed IFP - Initial Fee Due When Funds Are Available - Prisoner, #4 sent via U.S. Mail to Ryan Board (slk) |
Filing 4
ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and FOR PAYMENT OF FILING FEE: plaintiff to pay an initial partial fee of $1.82 when funds are available; plaintiff to make interim payments until the full fee is paid ; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat, cam)
|
| Filing 3 PROOF OF SERVICE by plaintiff Ryan Board #766060 re MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 , Complaint with Magistrate Referral #1 ("Cover Letter") (mlc) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by plaintiff Ryan Board #766060; (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents) (mlc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with magistrate referral against All Defendants filed by Ryan Board #766060 (Attachments: #1 Appendices A - G) (mlc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
