Daniels #657826 v. Falk
| Quinton Jamal Daniels #657826 |
| Derek Falk |
| 2:2019cv00214 |
| October 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Paul L Maloney |
| Maarten Vermaat |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 PRISONER FINANCIAL DOCUMENT(S) (cure deficiency): Certificate of Prisoner Institutional/Trust Fund Account and a Six Month Trust Account Statement submitted by plaintiff Quinton Jamal Daniels #657826 to cure deficiency (slk) |
Filing 9
DEFICIENCY ORDER regarding APPEAL: plaintiff/petitioner has failed to pay the appeal fee or file the required documents to apply to proceed in forma pauperis; ; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam)
|
| Copy of Deficiency Order (Appeal) #9 sent via U.S. Mail to Quinton Jamal Daniels (slk) |
| Filing 8 LETTER FROM CCA regarding appeal #7 indicating that the appeal has been dockted as case number 19-2407 (mlc) |
| CASE NUMBER 19-2407 assigned by the Sixth Circuit to appeal #7 (mkc) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL re #6 , #5 by plaintiff Quinton Jamal Daniels #657826 (mlc) |
| Copy of Notice of Appeal #7 with docket sheet sent via U.S. Mail to Quinton Jamal Daniels (mlc) |
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT that the action is dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, cmc) |
| Filing 5 OPINION; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, cmc) |
| Certified Copy of Judgment - Frivolous, Malicious, or for Failure to State a Claim (Prisoner Civil Rights Case) #6 , Opinion (Screening) #5 sent via U.S. Mail to Quinton Jamal Daniels (mlc) |
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT re MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 by plaintiff Quinton Jamal Daniels #657826 (mlc) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and FOR PAYMENT OF FILING FEE: plaintiff to pay an initial partial fee of $0.78 when funds are available; plaintiff to make interim payments until the full fee is paid ; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam)
|
| Copy of Order to Proceed IFP - Initial Fee Due When Funds Are Available - Prisoner, #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Quinton Jamal Daniels (mlc) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by plaintiff Quinton Jamal Daniels #657826; (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents) (mlc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with magistrate referral against Derek Falk filed by Quinton Jamal Daniels #657826 (Attachments: #1 Miscellaneous Exhibits) (mlc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Daniels #657826 v. Falk | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Derek Falk | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Quinton Jamal Daniels #657826 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
