Alltel Corporation v. Marquette, City of
Alltel Corporation, Alltel Corporation doing business as Verizon Wireless and Alltel Corporation a Delaware corporation doing business as Verizon Wireless |
CITY OF MARQUETTE and Marquette, City of |
2:2020cv00089 |
June 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Maarten Vermaat |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 NOTICE of telephone status conference, using the Court's conference line, set for 10/8/2020 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat; (cam) |
Filing 15 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Discovery - Phase I: Mtns for joinders and to amend pleadings due 9/9/2020, Def's disclosures submitted by 9/9/2020, Plf's disp mtn due 10/9/2020, Def's resp due 11/23/2020. If case not resolved, a second Rule 16 conf will be scheduled. ; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam) |
Filing 14 (CORRECTED) ANSWER to complaint, #1 with affirmative defenses by Marquette, City of (Keefe, Ronald) Modified text on 8/10/2020 (cam). |
Filing 13 ORDER (STIPULATED) re: Fed.R.Evid.502(d) ; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam) |
Filing 12 ORDER referring case to VOLUNTARY FACILITATIVE MEDIATION: plaintiff and VFM fee to be submitted by 8/20/2020; VFM to be completed by 10/5/2020 ; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam) |
Filing 11 MINUTES of scheduling conference by telephone held before Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (Proceedings Not Recorded) (cam) |
Filing 10 ORDER OF REFERENCE pursuant to consent of parties to dispositive jurisdiction by a US Magistrate Judge; case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr) |
Filing 9 JOINT STATUS REPORT (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order STIPULATED FED. R. EVID. 502(d) ORDER) (Remington, James) |
Filing 8 ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference by telephone: telephone Rule 16 scheduling conference set for 8/6/2020 at 10:00 AM, using the Court's conference line, before Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat; status report due by 8/3/2020 ; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING by defendant Marquette, City of re Answer to Complaint #6 and Affirmative Defenses (Keefe, Ronald) |
Filing 6 (DISREGARD) Defendant's ANSWER to complaint, #1 with affirmative defenses by Marquette, City of (Keefe, Ronald) Modified on 8/10/2020 - wrong document attached. See entry #14 for corrected answer (cam). |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Alltel Corporation as to Marquette, City of waiver sent on 6/22/2020, answer due 8/21/2020 (Remington, James) Modified text on 7/8/2020 to correct dates(slk). |
Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Marquette, City of (mlc) |
Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Paul L. Maloney (mlc) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Alltel Corporation identifying Corporate Parent AirTouch Cellular, Inc. for Alltel Corporation (Remington, James) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Marquette, City of filed by Alltel Corporation (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Exhibit A-1 of 3, #3 Exhibit A-2 of 3, #4 Exhibit A-3 of 3, #5 Exhibit B, #6 Exhibit C, #7 Exhibit D, #8 Exhibit E, #9 Exhibit F, #10 Exhibit G) (Remington, James) Modified text on 6/19/2020 (jlg) |
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Alltel Corporation in the amount of $400, receipt number AMIWDC-5368499 (Remington, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.