Hill #771743 v. Alger Maximum Correctional Facility et al
| Nathaniel Hill #771743 |
| Unknown Part(y)(ies) #1, Catherine Bauman, Unknown Part(y)(ies) #2 and Alger Maximum Correctional Facility |
| 2:2020cv00228 |
| November 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Janet T Neff |
| Maarten Vermaat |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RECEIPT (Prisoner Litigation): filing fee installment in the amount of $50.00, receipt number MQ006196; amount paid to date $400.00 (paid in full) (slk) |
| Copy of Deficiency Order, #2 sent via U.S. Mail to Nathaniel Hill (slk) |
Filing 2
DEFICIENCY ORDER: plaintiff/petitioner has failed to pay the remainder of the filing fee or file the required documents to apply to proceed in forma pauperis; deficiency to be cured by 12/23/2020 or the action will be dismissed ; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with magistrate referral against All Defendants filed by Nathaniel Hill #771743 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (mlc) |
| RECEIPT (Prisoner Litigation): initial filing fee installment in the amount of $350.00, receipt number GR072437; amount paid to date $350.00 (mlc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
