Sango #252200 v. Scheoder et al
Robert D. Sango #252200 |
Unknown Scheoder, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Westcomb and Unknown Olson |
2:2021cv00007 |
January 11, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Hala Y Jarbou |
Maarten Vermaat |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Copy of Order to Proceed IFP - Initial Fee Due When Funds Are Available - Prisoner, #5 sent via U.S. Mail to Robert D. Sango #252200 (jmw) |
Filing 5 ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and FOR PAYMENT OF FILING FEE: plaintiff to pay an initial partial fee of $5.06 when funds are available; plaintiff to make interim payments until the full fee is paid ; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam) |
Filing 4 Memorandum regarding potentially related case returned to Clerk from Magistrate Judge Green indicating that this case is not related (slk) |
Filing 3 PROOF OF SERVICE by plaintiff Robert D. Sango #252200 re MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 , Complaint with Magistrate Referral #1 (slk) |
Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by plaintiff Robert D. Sango #252200; (slk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with magistrate referral against All Defendants filed by Robert D. Sango #252200 (Attachments: #1 declarations of other inmates) (slk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.