Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Beau I. Johnson |
Commissioner of Social Security |
Social Security Administration |
2:2021cv00010 |
January 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Maarten Vermaat |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWW) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 AMENDED MINUTES of Oral Argument #29 held before Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat - to correct the date of the hearing only. (Proceedings Digitally Recorded on the Bridgeline) (cam) |
Filing 29 MINUTES of oral argument by telephone held before Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (Proceedings Digitally Recorded on the Bridgeline) (cam) |
Filing 28 JUDGMENT in accordance with the Court's oral opinion finding that decision of the Commissioner is affirmed; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat, rbk) |
Filing 27 ORDER granting #26 motion for the Assistant Regional Counsel to the Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel-Region VII to present oral argument in this case; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat, rbk) |
Filing 26 UNOPPOSED MOTION for order permitting SSA OGC attorney to present oral argument by defendant Commissioner of Social Security; (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Certification of Motion Concurrence Pursuant to Local Civ. Rule 7.1(d)) (Preston, Sarah) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Jason McCaul on behalf of plaintiff Beau I. Johnson (McCaul, Jason) |
Filing 25 REPLY BRIEF by plaintiff Beau I. Johnson (Olinsky, Howard) |
Filing 24 ORDER that oral argument is set for 5/25/2022 at 10:30 AM at by telephone before Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat, rbk) |
Filing 23 BRIEF by defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Stewart, Sean) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Sean Stewart on behalf of defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Stewart, Sean) |
Filing 22 INITIAL BRIEF by plaintiff Beau I. Johnson in Support of a Social Security Appeal (Olinsky, Howard) |
Filing 21 ORDER granting #20 motion for extension of time. Plf's initial brief shall be due December 30, 2021, Def's response is due 1/27/2022 and Plf's reply is due 2/10/2022; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam) |
Filing 20 THIRD MOTION for extension of time to file Plaintiff's Opening Brief in a Social Security Appeal (nunc pro tunc) by plaintiff Beau I. Johnson; (Attachments: #1 Cert. of Compliance) (Olinsky, Howard) |
Filing 19 ORDER granting #18 motion for extension of time to file briefs. Plaintiff's brief is due December 2, 2021. Defendant's response is due December 30, 2021. Plaintiff's reply brief is due January 13, 2022; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat, rbk) Modified text on 11/1/2021 (ns). |
Filing 18 SECOND MOTION for extension of time to file Plaintiff's Initial Brief by plaintiff Beau I. Johnson; (Attachments: #1 Cert. of Compliance, #2 Declaration of Howard D. Olinsky) (Olinsky, Howard) |
Filing 17 ORDER granting #16 motion for extension of time to file brief; Plaintiff's initial brief due Nov. 2, 2021, Defendant's brief due Nov. 30, 2021, reply brief due Dec. 14, 2021; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat, rbk) |
Filing 16 FIRST MOTION for extension of time to file Plaintiff's Social Security Brief by plaintiff Beau I. Johnson; (Attachments: #1 Cert. of Compliance) (Olinsky, Howard) |
Filing 15 JOINT STATEMENT consenting to proceed before the Magistrate Judge (Shiparski, Michael) |
Filing 14 NOTICE to the parties regarding consent and filing of briefs according to the following schedule: joint statement regarding consent due 8/20/2021, plaintiffs initial brief due 9/3/2021 defendants brief due 10/1/2021 plaintiffs reply brief due 10/15/2021 (cam) |
Filing 13 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS TRANSCRIPT ECF No. 11 and In lieu of separate Answer-W.D. Mich. LCivR 8.3 by defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Attachments: #1 Index, #2 Administrative Process Documents, #3 Payment Documents and Decisions - Exhibits 1A-4A, #4 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices - Exhibits 1B-9B, #5 Non Disability Related Development - Exhibits 1D-8D, #6 Disability Related Development - Exhibits 1E-15E, #7 Medical Records - Exhibits 1F-5F, #8 Medical Records - Exhibits 6F-11F, #9 Administrative Process Documents, #10 Payment Documents and Decisions - Exhibits 5A-8A, #11 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices - Exhibits 10B-20B, #12 Non Disability Related Development - Exhibits 9D-13D, #13 Disability Related Development - Exhibits 16E-21E, #14 Medical Records - Exhibits 12F-13F, #15 Medical Records - Exhibits 14F, #16 Medical Records - Exhibits 14F, #17 Medical Records - Exhibits 14F) (Shiparski, Michael) |
Filing 12 NOTICE re #11 Filing Administrative Transcript by defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Shiparski, Michael) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 motion for extension of time to file administrative record, due August 17, 2021; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat, rbk) |
Filing 10 UNOPPOSED MOTION for extension of time to file the electronic certified administrative record in lieu of an answer to plaintiff's complaint by defendant Commissioner of Social Security; (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jebby Rasputnis, Office of Appellate Operations, Social Security Administration, #2 Certification of Motion Concurrence Pursuant to L. Civ. R. 7.1(d)) (Preston, Sarah) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 motion for extension of time to file record on or before June 18, 2021; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat, rbk) |
Filing 8 UNOPPOSED MOTION for extension of time to file the certified administrative transcript in lieu of an answer to plaintiff's complaint by defendant Commissioner of Social Security; (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jebby Rasputnis, #2 Certification of Motion Concurrence Pursuant to Local Rule of Civ. Pro. 7.1(d)) (Preston, Sarah) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Sarah E. Preston on behalf of defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Preston, Sarah) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Michael L. Shiparski on behalf of defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Shiparski, Michael) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS returned executed by US Marshal on Commissioner of Social Security, US Attorney and US Attorney General; service upon defendant, Commissioner of Social Security complete on 2/18/2021, answer due 4/19/2021 (slk) |
Filing 6 NOTICE that this case was served on the Attorney General in Washington, D.C (documents for service fron the Local U.S. Attorney have not been received yet) (slk) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General and delivered to US Marshal for service (slk) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis ; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam) |
Filing 4 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (slk) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Olinsky, Howard) |
Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by plaintiff Beau I. Johnson; (Olinsky, Howard) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Beau I. Johnson (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Olinsky, Howard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.