Hendley #196496 v. Rogers et al
| Samuel Hendley #196496 |
| J. Rogers and M. McLean |
| 2:2021cv00017 |
| January 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Hala Y Jarbou |
| Maarten Vermaat |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RECEIPT (Prisoner Litigation): initial filing fee installment in the amount of $300.00, receipt number MQ006215; amount paid to date $300.00 (slk) |
Filing 3
ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and FOR PAYMENT OF FILING FEE: plaintiff to pay an initial partial fee of $44.45 within 28 days; plaintiff to make interim payments until the full fee is paid;( initial partial filing fee to be submitted by 2/22/2021) ; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam)
|
| Copy of Order to Proceed IFP - Initial Fee Due in 28 Days - Prisoner, #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Samuel Hendley (mlc) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by plaintiff Samuel Hendley #196496; (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents) (mlc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with magistrate referral against All Defendants filed by Samuel Hendley #196496 (Attachments: #1 Exhausted Grievances, #2 Attachment A - MDOC Misconduct Reports, #3 Attachment B - No Pleading Enclosed, #4 Attachment C - Grievance) (mlc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
