Harvey v. The Interlake Steamship Company et al
| Odell T. Harvey |
| Lake Superior & Ishpeming Railroad Company and The Interlake Steamship Company |
| 2:2021cv00078 |
| April 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Hala Y Jarbou |
| Maarten Vermaat |
| Marine |
| 46 U.S.C. ยง 688 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENT from Northern District of Ohio, of receipt of WDMI transfer case, assigning case number 1:21-cv-1204 (ems) |
| CASE ELECTRONICALLY TRANSFERRED to Northern District of Ohio (slk) |
Filing 15
ORDER granting #11 motion to transfer case to Northern District of Ohio; signed by District Judge Hala Y. Jarbou (haw)
|
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE regarding compliance with LCivR 7.1(d) re MOTION to transfer case to the Northern District of Ohio on consent of all parties #11 filed by The Interlake Steamship Company (Zonghetti, Gino) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER regarding motion to transfer case #11 and certificate of concurrence; signed by District Judge Hala Y. Jarbou (haw)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 motion for extension of time to answer; deadline for defendant Interlake Steamship Company's responsive pleading extended to 7/14/2021; signed by District Judge Hala Y. Jarbou (haw)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to transfer case to the Northern District of Ohio on consent of all parties by defendant The Interlake Steamship Company; (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Gino A. Zonghetti, Esq., #2 Memorandum of Law, #3 Certificate of Service) (Zonghetti, Gino) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATED MOTION for extension of time to file answer re #1 by defendant The Interlake Steamship Company; (Zonghetti, Gino) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 motion for order; deadline for defendant Lake Superior & Ishpeming Railroad Company's responsive pleading extended to 7/14/2021; signed by District Judge Hala Y. Jarbou (haw)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATED MOTION for order for Second Leave to Plead Until July 14, 2021 by defendant Lake Superior & Ishpeming Railroad Company; (Smith, Ryan) Modified text on 6/14/2021 (ems). |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 motion for extension of time to answer ; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (aer)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATED MOTION for extension of time to file answer re #1 until June 14, 2021 by defendant Lake Superior & Ishpeming Railroad Company; (Smith, Ryan) Modified text on 5/14/2021 (eod) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Ryan Thomas Smith on behalf of defendant Lake Superior & Ishpeming Railroad Company (Smith, Ryan) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS returned executed; Lake Superior & Ishpeming Railroad Company served on 4/22/2021, answer due 5/13/2021 (O'Bryan, Dennis) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS returned executed; The Interlake Steamship Company served on 4/22/2021, answer due 5/13/2021 (O'Bryan, Dennis) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants Lake Superior & Ishpeming Railroad Company, The Interlake Steamship Company (slk) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Hala Y. Jarbou (slk) |
| RECEIPT: in the amount of $402.00, receipt number AMIWDC-6414014; for Filing Fee by Dennis M. O'Bryan on the behalf of plaintiff (tlbu) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Lake Superior & Ishpeming Railroad Company, The Interlake Steamship Company filed by Odell T. Harvey (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons) (O'Bryan, Dennis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
