Griffith #165268 v. Huss et al
Shannon J. Griffith #165268 |
Erica Huss, Joe Biden, Dana Nessel, R. McCarthy, J. Bolton, Merrick Garland, Unknown Part(y)(ies), Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi E. Washington and Gretchen E. Whitmer |
2:2021cv00084 |
April 26, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Paul L Maloney |
Maarten Vermaat |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER REJECTING Motion to Nullify submitted by Shannon J. Griffith ; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (Attachments: #1 Rejected Document) (cam) |
Copy of Order Rejecting Pleading #4 with rejected documents sent via U.S. Mail to Shannon J. Griffith (mlc) |
Filing 3 LETTER from plaintiff Shannon J. Griffith #165268 regarding this alleged civil action never filed by plaintiff (mlc) |
Filing 2 DEFICIENCY ORDER: plaintiff/petitioner has failed to pay the filing fee or file the required documents to apply to proceed in forma pauperis; deficiency to be cured by 6/10/2021 or the action will be dismissed ; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam) |
Copy of Deficiency Order, #2 sent via U.S. Mail to Shannon J. Griffith (mlc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with magistrate referral against All Defendants filed by Shannon J. Griffith #165268 (mlc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.