Daniels #657826 v. St. Onge et al
| Quinton Jamal Daniels #657826 |
| Unknown St. Onge and Unknown Moyle |
| 2:2021cv00190 |
| August 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Maarten Vermaat |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER DENYING IFP UNDER THREE STRIKES RULE: plaintiff to pay the entire fee of $402.00 within 28 days or the case will be dismissed; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam)
|
|
Filing 5
OPINION; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam)
|
|
Copy of Opinion (Screening) #5 , Order Denying IFP - Three Strikes - Prisoner #6 sent via U.S. Mail to Quinton Jamal Daniels #657826 (ns)
|
|
Filing 4
STATEMENT RE CONSENT by plaintiff Quinton Jamal Daniels #657826 consenting to proceed before the Magistrate Judge (mg)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE to plaintiff regarding assignment of case and consent; statement regarding consent due 9/7/2021 (slk)
|
|
Copy of Notice Regarding Assignment of Case and Consent (Prisoner Civil Rights/State Habeas) #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Quinton Jamal Daniels (slk)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by plaintiff Quinton Jamal Daniels #657826; (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents) (slk)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Quinton Jamal Daniels #657826 (Attachments: #1 Miscellaneous Exhibits) (slk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
