Stone #489704 v. Schroeder et al
Plaintiff: Rubin Lamont Stone #489704
Defendant: Sarah Schroeder, Unknown Sutinen, M. Dunham and Dennis Peterson
Case Number: 2:2021cv00209
Filed: September 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Maarten Vermaat
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and FOR PAYMENT OF FILING FEE: plaintiff to pay an initial partial fee of $108.24 when funds are available; plaintiff to make interim payments until the full fee is paid; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam)
October 19, 2021 Copy of Order to Proceed IFP - Initial Fee Due When Funds Are Available - Prisoner, #7 sent via U.S. Mail to Rubin Lamont Stone #489704 (mg)
October 7, 2021 Filing 6 LETTER from plaintiff Rubin Lamont Stone #489704 regarding copies for service of defendants (Attachments: #1 Response from Clerk Memo) (mlc)
October 7, 2021 Filing 5 STATEMENT RE CONSENT by plaintiff Rubin Lamont Stone #489704 consenting to proceed before the Magistrate Judge (mlc)
September 28, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE to plaintiff regarding assignment of case and consent; statement regarding consent due 10/19/2021 (mg)
September 28, 2021 Copy of Notice Regarding Assignment of Case and Consent (Prisoner Civil Rights/State Habeas) #4 sent via U.S. Mail to Rubin Lamont Stone #489704 (mg)
September 23, 2021 Filing 3 LETTER from Rubin Stone #489704 regarding mailing. (mg)
September 23, 2021 Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents) (mg)
September 23, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against M. Dunham, Dennis Peterson, Sarah Schroeder, Unknown Sutinen filed by Rubin Lamont Stone #489704 (mg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stone #489704 v. Schroeder et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rubin Lamont Stone #489704
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sarah Schroeder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Sutinen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Dunham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dennis Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?