Nesto #419888 v. Horton
Petitioner: Rodger Nesto #419888
Respondent: Connie Horton
Case Number: 2:2021cv00225
Filed: November 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Maarten Vermaat
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2021 Opinion or Order (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Andrea M. Christensen-Brown on behalf of respondent Connie Horton (Christensen-Brown, Andrea)
December 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Copy of Order to Proceed IFP (Habeas) #7 sent via U.S. Mail to Rodger Nesto #419888 (mg)
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a habeas action; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam)
December 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PRISONER FINANCIAL DOCUMENT(S) (cure deficiency): Affidavit and financial documents submitted by plaintiff Rodger Nesto #419888 to cure deficiency (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents, #2 Attachment Cover Letter) (mg)
November 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Copy of Order to Answer (Habeas), #5 sent via U.S. Mail to Rodger Nesto #419888 (mg)
November 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO FILE ANSWER OR OTHER PLEADING: this order, petition and brief served electronically on Michigan Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of MI; respondent to answer the habeas petition within 180 days; no extensions will be granted; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (Attachments: #1 Petition and attachments) (cam)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STATEMENT RE CONSENT by petitioner Rodger Nesto #419888 consenting to proceed before the Magistrate Judge (ns)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DEFICIENCY ORDER: plaintiff/petitioner has failed to pay the filing fee or file the required documents to apply to proceed in forma pauperis; deficiency to be cured by 12/10/2021 or the action will be dismissed; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Copy of Deficiency Order, #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Rodger Nesto #419888 (ems)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE to petitioner regarding assignment of case and consent; statement regarding consent due 11/29/2021 (mg)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Copy of Notice Regarding Assignment of Case and Consent (Prisoner Civil Rights/State Habeas) #2 sent via U.S. Mail to Rodger Nesto #419888 (mg)
November 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Rodger Nesto #419888 (mg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nesto #419888 v. Horton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rodger Nesto #419888
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Connie Horton
Represented By: Andrea M. Christensen-Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?