Lyles #132720 v. Pierce et al
Roger L. Lyles #132720 |
Carolyn Pierce, Gerald Covert, Patricia Lamb, M. McClean, Willis Chapman, R. Buhl, Mary Doe and JPay |
2:2021cv00255 |
December 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Janet T Neff |
Maarten Vermaat |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Certified Copy of Judgment - Frivolous, Malicious, or for Failure to State a Claim (Prisoner Civil Rights Case) #4 , Opinion (Screening) #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Roger L. Lyles #132720 (eod) |
Filing 4 JUDGMENT that the action is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb) |
Filing 3 OPINION; Judgment to issue; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb) |
Filing 5 LETTER from Roger L. Lyles #132720 regarding case (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (mg) |
Filing 2 LETTER from plaintiff Roger L. Lyles #132720 requesting docket sheet; docket sheet mailed on 1/19/22. (ns) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Roger L. Lyles #132720 (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (pjw) |
RECEIPT: in the amount of $402.00, receipt number GR075818; for filing fee (pjw) |
STATEMENT RE CONSENT (as taken from #1 ) by plaintiff Roger L. Lyles #132720 requesting the case be assigned to a district judge (pjw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.