Schramm v. Neenah Paper Michigan, Inc.
| Thomas Schramm |
| Neenah Paper Michigan, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv00047 |
| March 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Paul L Maloney |
| Maarten Vermaat |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of James F. Hermon on behalf of defendant Neenah Paper Michigan, Inc. (Hermon, James) |
(NON-DOCUMENT) ORDER REFERRING MOTION for more definite statement #8 to Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A); signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE to attorney Brett Michael Gelbord regarding recent filing #10 (ems) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE regarding compliance with LCivR 7.1(d) re MOTION for more definite statement #8 filed by Neenah Paper Michigan, Inc. (Gelbord, Brett) Modified text on 4/19/2022 (ems). |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of compliance re word count for MOTION for more definite statement #8 filed by Neenah Paper Michigan, Inc. (Gelbord, Brett) Modified text on 4/19/2022 (ems). |
| Filing 8 MOTION for more definite statement with brief in support by defendant Neenah Paper Michigan, Inc.; (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Gelbord, Brett) Modified text on 4/19/2022 (ems). |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Brett Michael Gelbord on behalf of defendant Neenah Paper Michigan, Inc. (Gelbord, Brett) |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Ghannam, Amanda) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Neenah Paper Michigan, Inc. (ems) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Paul L. Maloney (ems) |
| Filing 4 CASE ASSIGNMENT REVIEW indicating the cases are related; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Roumel, Nicholas) |
| Filing 2 EXHIBIT re #1 by plaintiff Thomas Schramm (Roumel, Nicholas) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Wendy Edwards Marcotte on behalf of plaintiff Thomas Schramm (Marcotte, Wendy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants filed by Thomas Schramm (Roumel, Nicholas) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Thomas Schramm in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6682790 (Roumel, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Schramm v. Neenah Paper Michigan, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thomas Schramm | |
| Represented By: | Wendy Edwards Marcotte |
| Represented By: | Nicholas Roumel |
| Represented By: | Amanda M. Ghannam |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Neenah Paper Michigan, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Brett Michael Gelbord |
| Represented By: | James F. Hermon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
