Swanigan #275449 v. Washington et al
| David Swanigan #275449 |
| Heidi Washington, Unknown Part(y)(ies) and Michael A. Brown |
| 2:2022cv00050 |
| March 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Maarten Vermaat |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION to serve the complaint by USM service by plaintiff David Swanigan #275449; (ns) |
| Filing 3 STATEMENT RE CONSENT by plaintiff David Swanigan #275449 consenting to proceed before the Magistrate Judge (ns) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to plaintiff regarding assignment of case and consent; statement regarding consent due 3/25/2022 (ns) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Michael A. Brown, Unknown Part(y)(ies), Heidi Washington filed by David Swanigan #275449 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (ns) |
| Copy of Notice Regarding Assignment of Case and Consent (Prisoner Civil Rights/State Habeas) #2 with a docket sheet sent via U.S. Mail to David Swanigan (ns) |
| RECEIPT: in the amount of $402.00, receipt number MQ006344; for filing fee (ns) |
| SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendants Michael A. Brown, Unknown Part(y)(ies), Heidi Washington ; none provided. (ns) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
