Erickson v. Gogebic, County of et al
| Randy Erickson |
| Gogebic County, Scott Voit, Lucis Bucknell, Trevor Jackovich and Gogebic, County of |
| 2:2022cv00067 |
| March 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Paul L Maloney |
| Maarten Vermaat |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 JOINT STATUS REPORT (DeRouin, Amy) |
Filing 16
ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference by telephone for 5/26/2022 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat; status report due by 5/20/2022; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam)
|
| Filing 15 ANSWER to affirmative defenses by plaintiff Randy Erickson re #14 (DeRouin, Amy) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses and jury demand by Scott Voit (Seward, T.) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to affirmative defenses by plaintiff Randy Erickson re #12 (DeRouin, Amy) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to complaint #1 with affirmative defenses and reliance upon jury demand by Lucis Bucknell, Gogebic, County of, Trevor Jackovich (Kazim, Haider) Modified text on 4/20/2022 (pjw). |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS returned executed; Scott Voit served on 4/18/2022, answer due 5/9/2022 (DeRouin, Amy) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of T. Joseph Seward on behalf of defendant Scott Voit (Seward, T.) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Kali Henderson on behalf of defendant Scott Voit (Henderson, Kali) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS returned executed; Gogebic, County of served on 3/31/2022, answer due 4/21/2022 (DeRouin, Amy) Modified text on 4/12/2022 (ems). |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed; Lucis Bucknell served on 3/31/2022, answer due 4/21/2022 (DeRouin, Amy) Modified text on 4/12/2022 (ems). |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS returned executed; Trevor Jackovich served on 3/30/2022, answer due 4/20/2022 (DeRouin, Amy) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Haider A. Kazim on behalf of defendants Lucis Bucknell, Gogebic, County of, Trevor Jackovich (Kazim, Haider) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE that this case has been assigned to District Judge Paul L. Maloney and Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat for all further proceedings (pjw) |
| Filing 6 STATEMENT OF CASE by plaintiff Randy Erickson Plaintiff's statement Regarding Consent (Abent, Jonathan) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants Lucis Bucknell, Gogebic, County of, Trevor Jackovich, Scott Voit (slk) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to plaintiff regarding assignment of case and consent; statement regarding consent due 4/18/2022 (slk) |
| Filing 3 (DISREGARD) NOTICE to plaintiff regarding assignment of case and consent; statement regarding consent due 4/18/2022 (slk) Modified text on 3/28/2022 (slk). |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) NOTICE that Notice Regarding Assignment of Case and Consent (Prisoner Civil Rights/State Habeas) #3 was filed in error and should be disregarded - please see #4 for the correct document (slk) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (DeRouin, Amy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Lucis Bucknell, Gogebic, County of, Trevor Jackovich, Scott Voit filed by Randy Erickson (DeRouin, Amy) Modified text on 3/28/2022 (slk). |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Randy Erickson in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6704109 (DeRouin, Amy) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Jonathan Arnold Abent on behalf of plaintiff Randy Erickson (Abent, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
