Doss #531147 v. Corizon Inc. et al
| Timmy Junior Doss #531147 |
| Corizon Inc. and Michigan State Industrial Optical |
| 2:2022cv00144 |
| July 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Hala Y Jarbou |
| Maarten Vermaat |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Copy of Order to Proceed IFP - Initial Fee Due When Funds Are Available - Prisoner, #4 sent via U.S. Mail to Timmy Junior Doss #531147 (ns)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and FOR PAYMENT OF FILING FEE: plaintiff to pay an initial partial fee of $49.45 when funds are available; plaintiff to make interim payments until the full fee is paid; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of receipt of case; copy mailed to Timmy Junior Doss #531147 Modified text on 7/13/2022 (jrg).
|
|
Filing 2
APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents) (jrg)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with jury demand against Corizon Inc., Michigan State Industrial Optical filed by Timmy Junior Doss #531147 (Attachments: #1 Attachment A, #2 Attachment B, #3 Attachment C, #4 Attachment D, #5 Attachment E, #6 Attachment F) (jrg)
|
|
STATEMENT RE CONSENT (as taken from #1 ) by plaintiff Timmy Junior Doss #531147 requesting the case be assigned to a district judge (jrg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
