Erickson-Anderla v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Kandi L. Erickson-Anderla |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 2:2022cv00161 |
| August 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Maarten Vermaat |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWW) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Sarah E. Preston on behalf of defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Preston, Sarah) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS returned executed on Commissioner of Social Security, US Attorney and US Attorney General; service upon defendant, Commissioner of Social Security complete on 9/20/2022, answer due 11/21/2022 (Olinsky, Howard) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (eod) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (eod) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Olinsky, Howard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Kandi L. Erickson-Anderla (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Olinsky, Howard) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Kandi L. Erickson-Anderla in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6812020 (Olinsky, Howard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
