Malm #848914 v. Brown
Dani Ray Malm #848914 |
Michael Brown |
2:2022cv00169 |
August 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Maarten Vermaat |
Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 PRISONER FINANCIAL DOCUMENT(S) (cure deficiency): application to proceed IFP and financial documents (no action taken as filing fee has been paid) submitted by plaintiff Dani Ray Malm #848914 to cure deficiency (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents) (mg) |
RECEIPT: filing fee in the amount of $ 5.00, receipt number #100000140 (jmw) |
Filing 6 ORDER TO FILE ANSWER OR OTHER PLEADING: this order, petition and brief served electronically on Michigan Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of MI; respondent to answer the habeas petition within 180 days; no extensions will be granted; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Brief & Attachment 1, #3 Brief & Attachment 2, #4 Brief & Attachment 2.2, #5 Brief & Attachment 3, #6 Brief & Attachment 4, #7 Brief & Attachment 5) (cam) |
Copy of Order to Answer (Habeas) #6 (order only) sent via U.S. Mail to Dani Ray Malm #848914 (mg) |
Filing 5 (DISREGARD) ORDER TO FILE ANSWER OR OTHER PLEADING: this order, petition and brief served electronically on Michigan Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of MI; respondent to answer the habeas petition within 180 days; no extensions will be granted; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam) Modified on 9/6/2022 - Couldn't complete this filing because one of the attachments is too big. Pro Se Dept will divide them up so they are small enough to file (cam). |
Filing 4 DEFICIENCY ORDER: plaintiff/petitioner has failed to pay the filing fee or file the required documents to apply to proceed in forma pauperis; deficiency to be cured by 9/27/2022 or the action will be dismissed; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam) |
Copy of Deficiency Order, #4 sent via U.S. Mail to Dani Ray Malm #848914 (mg) |
Copy of Receipt of Case Notice #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Dani Ray Malm (jjm) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of receipt of case (jjm) |
Filing 2 BRIEF by petitioner Dani Malm #848914 re #1 (Attachments: #1 Index, #2 Appendix A, #3 Appendix B, #4 Appendix C, #5 Appendix D, #6 Appendix E, #7 Appendix F) (jjm) |
Filing 1 PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Dani Malm #848914 (jjm) |
STATEMENT RE CONSENT (as taken from #1 ) by petitioner Dani Malm #848914 consenting to proceed before the Magistrate Judge (jjm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Malm #848914 v. Brown | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Dani Ray Malm #848914 | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Michael Brown | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.