Clarke v. Columbia Books Inc. d/b/a Columbia Books & Information Services
Kyle Clarke |
Columbia Books Inc. d/b/a Columbia Books & Information Services |
2:2022cv00172 |
August 31, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
P.I.: Other |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Columbia Books Inc. d/b/a Columbia Books & Information Services filed by Kyle Clarke (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A-Columbia Books & Information Services Masterfile Email List Mailing List, #3 Exhibit B-Privacy: Sales, Rentals of Videos, etc., House Legislative Analysis Section, H.B. No. 5331, Jan. 20, 1989, #4 Exhibit C-The Information Marketplace: Merging and Exchanging Consumer Data (Mar. 13, 2001), #5 Exhibit D-Web's Hot New Commodity: Privacy, WSJ.com (Feb. 28, 2011), #6 Exhibit E-Statement of FTC Commissioner Pamela Jones Harbour (Dec. 7, 2009), #7 Exhibit F-Martha C. White, Big Data Knows What You're Doing Right Now, TIME.com (July 31, 2012), #8 Exhibit G-Natasha Singer, You for Sale: Mapping, and Sharing, the Consumer Genome, N.Y. Times (June 16, 2012), #9 Exhibit H-Letter from Senator John D. Rockefeller IV, Chairman, Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, to Scott E. Howe, Chief Executive Officer, Acxiom (Oct. 9, 2012), #10 Exhibit I-Bipartisan Group of Lawmakers Query Data Brokers About Practices Involving Consumers' Personal Information, Website of Senator Ed Markey (July 24, 2012), #11 Exhibit J-Prize Scams, Federal Trade Commission, #12 Exhibit K-Charles Duhigg, Bilking the Elderly, With a Corporate Assist, N.Y. Times, May 20, 2007, #13 Exhibit L-Fraud Against Seniors: Hearing before the Senate Special Committee on Aging (August 10, 2000), #14 Exhibit M-2014 TRUSTe US Consumer Confidence Privacy Report, TRUSTe, #15 Exhibit N-Joshua Brustein, Start-Ups Seek to Help Users Put a Price on Their Personal Data, N.Y. Times (Feb. 12, 2012), #16 Exhibit O-European Network and Information Security Agency, Study on monetising privacy (Feb. 27, 2012), #17 Exhibit P-Hann, et al., The Value of Online Information Privacy: An Empirical Investigation (Oct. 2003), #18 Exhibit Q-California's Reader Privacy Act Signed into Law, Electronic Frontier Foundation (Oct. 3, 2011)) (Miller, E.) |
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Kyle Clarke in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6832383 (Miller, E.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Clarke v. Columbia Books Inc. d/b/a Columbia Books & Information Services | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kyle Clarke | |
Represented By: | E. Powell Miller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Columbia Books Inc. d/b/a Columbia Books & Information Services | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.