Bickham #777727 v. Loman et al
Plaintiff: Martez Romal Bickham #777727
Defendant: C. Loman, E. Hoover, R. Vanderschaegen and S. Schroeder
Case Number: 2:2022cv00182
Filed: September 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Maarten Vermaat
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2022 Opinion or Order RECEIPT (Prisoner Litigation): filing fee installment in the amount of $3.33, receipt number 100000506; amount paid to date $13.33 (klb)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order RECEIPT (Prisoner Litigation): initial filing fee installment in the amount of $10.00, receipt number 100000339; amount paid to date $10.00 (jmw)
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and FOR PAYMENT OF FILING FEE: the agency having custody of plaintiff to pay an initial partial fee of $3.33; interim payments to continue until the full fee is paid; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam)
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Copy of Order to Proceed IFP - Initial Fee Due in 28 Days - Prisoner, #4 sent via U.S. Mail to Martez Romal Bickham #777727 (ems)
September 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of receipt of case (ems)
September 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by plaintiff Martez Romal Bickham #777727 (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents) (ems)
September 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against E. Hoover, C. Loman, S. Schroeder, R. Vanderschaegen filed by Martez Romal Bickham #777727 (ems)
September 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Copy of Receipt of Case Notice #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Martez Romal Bickham #777727 (ems)
September 20, 2022 Opinion or Order STATEMENT RE CONSENT (as taken from #1 ) by plaintiff Martez Romal Bickham #777727 consenting to proceed before the Magistrate Judge (ems)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bickham #777727 v. Loman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Martez Romal Bickham #777727
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. Loman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E. Hoover
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. Vanderschaegen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. Schroeder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?