Stephan v. Barclays Bank Delaware
| Elizabeth Stephan |
| Barclays Bank Delaware |
| 2:2022cv00220 |
| November 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Robert J Jonker |
| Maarten Vermaat |
| Truth in Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #14 motion to seal document; signed by Judge Robert J. Jonker (Judge Robert J. Jonker, sdb)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference: Rule 16 scheduling conference is set for 3/1/2023 at 04:00 PM at 699 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Judge Robert J. Jonker; status report due by 2/22/2023; signed by Judge Robert J. Jonker (Judge Robert J. Jonker, sdb)
|
| Filing 16 SEALED EXHIBIT by defendant Barclays Bank Delaware re MOTION to SEAL DOCUMENT #14 (DeFrank, Michael) Modified text on 1/20/2023 per Order #18 (ns). |
| Filing 15 BRIEF in support of MOTION to SEAL DOCUMENT #14 filed by Barclays Bank Delaware (DeFrank, Michael) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to SEAL DOCUMENT by defendant Barclays Bank Delaware; (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Third Declaration of Stephenie Beauchamp) (DeFrank, Michael) |
| Filing 13 DECLARATION re #11 Stephenie Beauchamp by defendant Barclays Bank Delaware (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit Login History, #3 Exhibit Click Report) (DeFrank, Michael) |
| Filing 12 BRIEF in support of MOTION to compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings #11 filed by Barclays Bank Delaware (DeFrank, Michael) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings by defendant Barclays Bank Delaware; (DeFrank, Michael) |
| Filing 10 Notice of WITHDRAWAL by plaintiff Elizabeth Stephan of MOTION for extension of time to file response/reply re #6 , #4 #7 filed by Elizabeth Stephan (Lyngklip, Ian) |
| Filing 9 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Barclays Bank Delaware filed by Elizabeth Stephan (Attachments: #1 Index Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit Barclay's Correspondence dated January 12, 2021, #3 Exhibit FTC Affidavit, #4 Exhibit Police Report of Identity Theft, #5 Exhibit Sworn Dispute dated April 20, 2021, #6 Exhibit Sworn Dispute dated May 26, 2021, #7 Exhibit Sworn Dispute dated September 29, 2021, #8 Exhibit Barclay's Correspondence dated October 27, 2021, #9 Exhibit Barclay's Correspondence dated November 4, 2021) (Lyngklip, Ian) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting STIPULATION #6 ; signed by Judge Robert J. Jonker (Judge Robert J. Jonker, sdb)
|
| Filing 7 (WITHDRAWN) MOTION for extension of time to file response/reply re #6 , #4 with Brief in Support and certificate of service by plaintiff Elizabeth Stephan; (Lyngklip, Ian) Modified text on 12/29/2022 (pjw). Modified text on 12/30/2022 per #10 (ns). |
| Filing 6 PROPOSED STIPULATION and ORDER For Amendment of the Complaint by plaintiff Elizabeth Stephan (Lyngklip, Ian) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Michael D. DeFrank on behalf of defendant Barclays Bank Delaware (DeFrank, Michael) |
| Filing 5 DECLARATION re #4 Declaration Of Stephenie Beauchamp by defendant Barclays Bank Delaware (Attachments: #1 Index, #2 Exhibit 1. Application., #3 Exhibit 2. Cardmember Agreement., #4 Exhibit 3.(Part 1 or 2) - Billing Statements., #5 Exhibit 3 (Part 2 of 2) - Billing Statement.) (Gura, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 (DEEMED MOOT BY #8 AND #9 ) MOTION to compel arbitration and stay proceedings or, in the alternative, MOTION to dismiss with Brief in Support by defendant Barclays Bank Delaware; (Gura, Christopher) Modified text on 12/1/2022 (ns). Modified text on 1/2/2023 (cam). |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Barclays Bank Delaware identifying Corporate Parent Barclays Financial Corporation, Corporate Parent Barclays Group US, Inc., Corporate Parent Barclays Bank, PLC, Corporate Parent Barclays, PLC for Barclays Bank Delaware (Gura, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Robert J. Jonker ; with NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re corporate disclosure statement (ns) |
| (NON-DOCUMENT) ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Ian Bryce Lyngklip on behalf of plaintiff Elizabeth Stephan (Lyngklip, Ian) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 95B District Court of Dickinson County case number 22-8626-GC filed by Barclays Bank Delaware (Gura, Christopher) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by defendant Barclays Bank Delaware in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-6907745 (Gura, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stephan v. Barclays Bank Delaware | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Elizabeth Stephan | |
| Represented By: | Ian Bryce Lyngklip |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Barclays Bank Delaware | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Robert Gura |
| Represented By: | Michael D. DeFrank |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
