Torvinen v. Seattle Service Bureau, Inc.
| Jeffrey Torvinen |
| Seattle Service Bureau, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv00007 |
| January 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Hala Y Jarbou |
| Maarten Vermaat |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference by telephone for 4/11/2023 at 02:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat; status report due by 4/4/2023; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant To Rule 12(b)(6) Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure by defendant Seattle Service Bureau, Inc.; (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order Granting Defendant Seattle Service Bureau, Inc.'s Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant To Rule 12(b)(6) Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure) (Kaminski, David)
|
|
Filing 8
STIPULATION AND ORDER extending answer deadline to 2/22/2023; signed by Chief Judge Hala Y. Jarbou (aks)
|
|
Filing 7
PROPOSED STIPULATION and ORDER to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint By Not More Than 30 Days by defendant Seattle Service Bureau, Inc. [Attorney David Kaminski added to party Seattle Service Bureau, Inc.(pty:dft)] (Kaminski, David) Modified text on 2/3/2023 (ems).
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS returned executed; Seattle Service Bureau, Inc. served on 1/11/2023, answer due 2/1/2023 (Cotner, Roger)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Seattle Service Bureau, Inc. (jjm)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE that this case has been assigned to Hala Y. Jarbou (jjm)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE regarding assignment of case from Southern Division 1:23-cv-37 to Northern Division per Administrative Order 11-035; all future filings should reflect the NEW CASE NUMBER of 2:23-cv-7. (jlg)
|
|
Filing 2
PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Cotner, Roger)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with jury demand against Seattle Service Bureau, Inc. filed by Jeffrey Torvinen (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Silver Lake State Park map, #2 Exhibit B - Police Report, #3 Exhibit C - NSB Notice 7/27/2022, #4 Exhibit D - NSB 5-Day Letter 8/29/2022, #5 Exhibit E - NSB Response 11/11/2022) (Cotner, Roger)
|
|
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by attorney Roger G. Cotner on behalf of plaintiff in the amount of $402.00, credit card receipt number AMIWDC-6946101 (jlg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Torvinen v. Seattle Service Bureau, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jeffrey Torvinen | |
| Represented By: | Roger G. Cotner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Seattle Service Bureau, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | David Kaminski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
