Choate #886291 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
Plaintiff: Alsaville Choate #886291
Defendant: Michigan Department of Corrections, Kim Hill and Unknown Anderson
Case Number: 2:2023cv00194
Filed: October 13, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Maarten Vermaat
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2023 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by defendants Unknown Anderson, Kim Hill, Michigan Department of Corrections re Attorney Appearance (Limited) (Lane, Alicia)
November 6, 2023 (NON-DOCUMENT) LIMITED ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Alicia Lane on behalf of defendants Unknown Anderson, Kim Hill, Michigan Department of Corrections for purposes of the Prisoner Civil Rights Litigation Early Mediation Program (Lane, Alicia)
October 19, 2023 Copy of Order Staying Case and Referring to Early Mediation Program, #4 sent via U.S. Mail to Alsaville Choate #886291 (ns)
October 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER STAYING CASE and referring to EARLY MEDIATION: case is stayed for 120 days to allow parties to participate in mediation; IFP is granted; the 90-day period for service is tolled; the MI Attorney General shall enter a limited appearance by November 8, 2023; w/attached Protocol; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam)
October 13, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of receipt of case (slk)
October 13, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by plaintiff Alsaville Choate #886291; (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2 - Financial Documents) (slk)
October 13, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Alsaville Choate #886291 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (Exhibit 2 (financial documents) included in filing #2 ), #2 Exhibit 3) (slk) Modified text on 10/13/2023 (slk).
October 13, 2023 Copy of Receipt of Case Notice #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Alsaville Choate (slk)
October 13, 2023 STATEMENT RE CONSENT (as taken from #1 ) by plaintiff Alsaville Choate #886291 consenting to proceed before the Magistrate Judge (slk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Choate #886291 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alsaville Choate #886291
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michigan Department of Corrections
Represented By: Alicia Lane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kim Hill
Represented By: Alicia Lane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Anderson
Represented By: Alicia Lane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?