Board of Trustees of the Upper Peninsula Plumbers and Pipefitters Pension Fund v. Viau
| The Upper Peninsula Plumbers and Pipefitters Pension Fund and Board of Trustees of the Upper Peninsula Plumbers and Pipefitters Pension Fund |
| Kathryn A. Viau and Kathryn Viau |
| 2:2023cv00225 |
| November 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Jane M Beckering |
| Maarten Vermaat |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Kathryn Viau (mg) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE that this case has been assigned to Jane M. Beckering (mg) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Board of Trustees of the Upper Peninsula Plumbers and Pipefitters Pension Fund (Pasternak, Edward) Modified text on 11/22/2023 (mg). |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Pasternak, Edward) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kathryn Viau filed by Board of Trustees of the Upper Peninsula Plumbers and Pipefitters Pension Fund (Pasternak, Edward) Modified text on 11/22/2023 (mg). |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Board of Trustees of the Upper Peninsula Plumbers and Pipefitters Pension Fund in the amount of $402, receipt number AMIWDC-7222179 (Pasternak, Edward) Modified text on 11/22/2023 (mg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
