Chandler #359031 v. Minerick et al
| Robert Chandler #359031 |
| Unknown Minerick, Unknown Dums, Unknown Haapala and Unknown Massie |
| 2:2024cv00003 |
| January 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Maarten Vermaat |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
JUDGMENT dismissing case without prejudice; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying IFP - Three Strikes. re #2 ; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam)
|
|
Filing 4
OPINION; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam)
|
|
Copy of Order #5 , Judgment Dismissing Case #6 , Opinion #4 sent via U.S. Mail to Robert Chandler #359031 (klb)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of receipt of case (jjm)
|
|
Copy of Receipt of Case Notice #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Robert Chandler #359031 (jjm)
|
|
Filing 2
APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents) (jjm)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with magistrate referral against Unknown Dums, Unknown Haapala, Unknown Massie, Unknown Minerick filed by Robert Chandler #359031 (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1) (jjm)
|
|
STATEMENT RE CONSENT (as taken from #1 ) by plaintiff Robert Chandler #359031 consenting to proceed before the Magistrate Judge (jjm)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
