Northern Michigan University v. Hampden Engineering Corporation
| Northern Michigan University |
| Hampden Engineering Corporation |
| 2:2024cv00214 |
| December 19, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Jane M Beckering |
| Ray Kent |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: absent a responsive pleading on behalf of Defendant, Plaintiff shall, not later than 2/25/2025, move for an entry of default or show cause in writing; signed by District Judge Jane M. Beckering (rmw)
|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS returned executed; Hampden Engineering Corporation served on 12/23/2024, answer due 1/13/2025 (Giroux, Erika) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE that this case is now referred to Magistrate Judge Ray Kent ; case is no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (mlc) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF RECUSAL: Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat recused from this case; case to be reassigned; signed by Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat (cam)
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendant Hampden Engineering Corporation (slk) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE that this case has been assigned to Jane M. Beckering (slk) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Giroux, Erika) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Northern Michigan University (Giroux, Erika) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Hampden Engineering Corporation filed by Northern Michigan University (Attachments: #1 Index, #2 Exhibit 1 - Hampden Bid in Response to NMU RFQ, #3 Exhibit 2 - NMU Purchase Order P0030943 for June Order, #4 Exhibit 3 - Hampden Acknowledgement of June Order, #5 Exhibit 4 - Hampden Invoice 57858-1 for June Order, #6 Exhibit 5 - Check 556934 - Deposit for June Order, #7 Exhibit 6 - Hampden Quotation for September Order, #8 Exhibit 7 - NMU Purchase Order P0031448 for September Order, #9 Exhibit 8 - Hampden Acknowledgement of September Order, #10 Exhibit 9 - Hampden Invoice 57924-1 for September Order, #11 Exhibit 10 - Check 558124 - Deposit for September Order, #12 Exhibit 11 - Email Communications Between NMU and Hampden, #13 Exhibit 12.Email Communications Between NMU and Hampden, #14 Exhibit 13 - NMU Demand Letter to Hampden) (Giroux, Erika) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Northern Michigan University in the amount of $405, receipt number AMIWDC-7571235 (Giroux, Erika) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Northern Michigan University v. Hampden Engineering Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Northern Michigan University | |
| Represented By: | Erika L. Giroux |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hampden Engineering Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
