Bullock v. AIU Insurance Co., et al
1:2004cv00835 |
November 18, 2004 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Southern Office |
Louis Guirola |
Robert H. Walker |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 171 JUDGMENT: judgment is rendered in favor of the defendant, The Gottfried Corporation, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.56. The plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 3/22/2010 (wld) |
Filing 66 ORDER granting 59 Motion to Vacate, granting 61 Motion for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b), granting 63 Motion to Stay . Plaintiff's claims against all defendants are hereby dismissed pursuant to FED.R.CIV.P.54(b). This judgment shall s upplant the final judgment entered on April 27, 2006. All proceedings relating to the cross-claim filed by the Gottfried Corporation against AIU and AIG are hereby stayed pending resolution of plaintiff's direct appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Therefore, the case shall remain pending as to defendant Gottfried's cross-claim. Signed by Judge Louis Guirola Jr. on 7/17/06. (wd ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bullock v. AIU Insurance Co., et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.