Bullock v. AIU Insurance Co., et al
Case Number: 1:2004cv00835
Filed: November 18, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Southern Office
Presiding Judge: Louis Guirola
Presiding Judge: Robert H. Walker
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 171 JUDGMENT: judgment is rendered in favor of the defendant, The Gottfried Corporation, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.56. The plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 3/22/2010 (wld)
July 17, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER granting 59 Motion to Vacate, granting 61 Motion for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b), granting 63 Motion to Stay . Plaintiff's claims against all defendants are hereby dismissed pursuant to FED.R.CIV.P.54(b). This judgment shall s upplant the final judgment entered on April 27, 2006. All proceedings relating to the cross-claim filed by the Gottfried Corporation against AIU and AIG are hereby stayed pending resolution of plaintiff's direct appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Therefore, the case shall remain pending as to defendant Gottfried's cross-claim. Signed by Judge Louis Guirola Jr. on 7/17/06. (wd )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bullock v. AIU Insurance Co., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?