Osprey Ship Management, Inc. v. Jackson County Port Authority et al
| 1:2005cv00390 |
| August 9, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Southern Office |
| Halil S. Ozerden |
| Robert H. Walker |
| Contract: Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
385
ORDER denying 380 Joint Motion for Entry of Judgment. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 10/15/2008. (EMN)
|
|
Filing
372
JUDGMENT in favor of plaintiffs Cormorant Shipholding Corp., Osprey Ship Management, Inc. against Don Foster in the amount of $826,051.59 plus post-judgment interest; plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Northrom Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. are dismissed with prejudice; USA's 3rd party complaint and Northrop Grumman's 3rd party complaint are dismissed without prejudice; any remaining pending motions are denied as moot. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 9/18/2008.(avm)
|
|
Filing
332
ORDER granting 308 Defendant Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc.'s Motion in Limine to Strike the Report and Opinions of Erik J. Fiske. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 2/6/2008. (EMN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Osprey Ship Management, Inc. v. Jackson County Port Authority et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
