Horridge v. Keystone Lines, Inc. et al
Case Number: 1:2006cv01226
Filed: December 5, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Southern Office
Presiding Judge: Louis Guirola
Presiding Judge: John M. Roper
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER denying Plaintiffs' 87 Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, or, in the Alternative, for a New Trial. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 12/15/2008. (EMN)
October 9, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 86 FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Gerard Horridge, Judith Horridge against Keystone Lines, Inc., Richard Williams. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 10/8/08. (wld)
October 8, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER granting in part and denying in part oral Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Keystone Logistics dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 10/8/08 (wld)
October 1, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiffs' 64 Motion in Limine. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 10/1/2008. (EMN)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Horridge v. Keystone Lines, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?