Magruder et al v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company
| Thomas D. Magruder and Virginia Carrington Magruder |
| Amica Mutual Insurance Company |
| 1:2007cv00564 |
| April 23, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Southern Office |
| Jackson |
| L. T. Senter |
| Robert H. Walker |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
265
ORDER denying Defendant's 103 Motion to Strike; denying Plaintiffs' 116 Motion to Exclude; denying Plaintiffs' 216 Motion in Limine; denying (for docket control purposes) Plaintiffs' 217 Motion in Limine; den ying Plaintiffs' 218 Motion in Limine; denying Plaintiffs' 219 Motion in Limine; granting Plaintiffs' 222 Motion in Limine; granting Defendant's 223 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denyin g in part Defendant's 224 Motion in Limine; granting Defendant's 225 Motion in Limine; granting Defendant's 226 Motion in Limine; granting Defendant's 227 Motion in Limine; granting Defendant� 39;s 229 Motion in Limine; granting Defendant's 230 Motion in Limine; denying Defendant's 231 Motion in Limine; denying Defendant's 232 Motion in Limine; denying Defendant's 233 Motion in L imine; denying Defendant's 234 Motion in Limine; granting Defendant's 235 Motion in Limine; granting Defendant's 236 Motion in Limine; denying Defendant's 237 Motion in Limine; granting Defendant's 238 Motion in Limine; denying Defendant's 239 Motion in Limine. Signed by Senior Judge L. T. Senter, Jr, on 02/10/2009 (kbo)
|
|
Filing
262
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CONCERNING EVIDENCE OF ACTUAL CASH VALUE OF THE INSURED PROPERTY BY THE PLAINTIFFS granting Plaintiffs' 207 Motion for Leave to supplement their designation of expert witnesses to include themselves as experts conc erning the actual cash value of their insured property at the time of loss; denying Defendant's 210 Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' third set of supplemental responses to Defendant's first set of interrogatories (the responses having de signated the plaintiffs as experts concerning the actual cash value of their insured property at the time of loss). Plaintiffs shall, prior to the pre-trial conference on February 9, 2009, further supplement their discovery responses to state the fa ctual basis that supports Plaintiffs' anticipated testimony concerning the actual cash value of the insured property on the date of loss. At the pre-trial conference, the Court will decide whether additional discovery is necessary to allow Defendant a full and fair opportunity to meet Plaintiffs' opinion testimony concerning the actual cash value of the insured property at trial. Signed by Senior Judge L. T. Senter, Jr, on 02/04/2009 (kbo)
|
|
Filing
241
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON CERTAIN MOTIONS IN LIMINE granting Plaintiffs' 220 Motion in Limine to exclude any reference to any possible effect a verdict against the defendant may have on insurance premium rates; granting Pla intiffs' 221 Motion in Limine to exclude evidence relating to a grant provided by the Mississippi Development Authority; granting Defendant's 228 Motion in Limine to exclude any reference to the loss reserves it has established. Signed by Senior Judge L. T. Senter, Jr, on 02/03/2009 (kbo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
