Guiher v. Newcomb
Plaintiff: Susan Guiher
Defendant: Ron Newcomb
Case Number: 1:2007cv00691
Filed: June 13, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Southern Office
County: Pearl River
Presiding Judge: Louis Guirola
Presiding Judge: John M. Roper
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 42 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION granting 27 Motion for Summary Judgment and 33 Motion to Strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Roper on 10/3/2008 (Regenold, Sheryal) Modified on 10/3/2008 (mbs).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Guiher v. Newcomb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susan Guiher
Represented By: R. Douglas Bayles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ron Newcomb
Represented By: J. Henry Ros
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?