Williams et al v. City of Gulfport, Mississippi et al
| Mary O. Williams, George Bush and GCW, LLC |
| City of Gulfport, Mississippi and John Does 1-5 |
| 1:2007cv00906 |
| June 27, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Southern Office |
| Harrison |
| John M. Roper |
| Louis Guirola |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
JUDGMENT in favor of City of Gulfport, Mississippi. Plaintiffs' claims against the City of Gulfport, Mississippi are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs' claims against the John Doe defendants are dimissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 2/7/2011 (wld)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER granting 100 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting 100 Motion for Reconsideration. The Memorandum Opinion and Order and Judgment are hereby vacated and set aside: re 92 Judgment, 91 Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Strike. The defendants are granted until December 10, 2010 to file a brief responding to the issues raised in plaintiffs' reconsideration motions. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 11/22/2010 (wld)
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING STANDING AND IMMUNITY ISSUES presented in 6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by City of Gulfport, Mississippi. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr on 5/7/10 (Whitsitt, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
