Stewart v. Perry et al
| Tanya Denise Stewart |
| Johnnie Mae Perry, Jackson County, Mississippi, Singing River Hospital Systems, Singing River Hospital, Ocean Springs Hospital, Joseph P. Vice, Gregory Horn, Ocean Springs Police Department, Department of Health and Human Services, Harrison County, Mississippi, Family and Children Services, Deanna Chase, Lana M. Hoda, Biloxi Police Department, Harrison County Youth Court, Mississippi, Family Court, Michael H. Ward, Herbert Wilson and Angelique White |
| 1:2007cv01270 |
| December 20, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Southern Office |
| Harrison |
| Louis Guirola |
| Robert H. Walker |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER dismissing Jackson County, Mississippi sua sponte. Signed by District Judge Walter J. Gex III on September 16, 2009. (Gex, Kathleen)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER: Pursuant to the Court's Memorandum Opinion 74 addressing the motion 55 for summary judgment filed by Defendants Deanna Chase and Lana M. Hoda, Defendants' motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff's 1983 claim against Defenda nts in their individual capacities is granted, and the claim is dismissed with prejudice; any state law claims are dismissed without prejudice; the parties shall bear their respective costs. Signed by District Judge Walter J. Gex III on September 8, 2009. (Gex, Kathleen)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER pursuant to the Court's Memorandum Opinion 53 . Defendant Singing River Hospital System's motion 36 to dismiss granted in part; denied in part. Plaintiff's state law claims against Singing River, if any, are dismissed; Plain tiff's section 1983 claims against Singing River are denied; the parties shall bear their respective costs relative to this motion. Signed by District Judge Walter J. Gex, III on January 14, 2009. (Gex, Kathleen) Modified on 2/11/2009 (Gex, Kathleen).
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER purusant to the Court's Memorandum Opinion 50 addressing the State Defendants' motion to dismiss. State Defendants' motion to dismiss 30 is granted in part and denied in part; all section 1983 claims against MDHS and FCS are dismissed with prejudice; all section 1983 claims against Chase and Hoda in their official capacities are dismissed with prejudice; the section 1983 claims against Chase and Hode in their individual capacities are denied, and these Defendants may re urge this issue in a motion for summary judgment; state law claims, if any, against MDHS and FCS are dismissed without prejudice; the parties shall bear their respective costs in association with this motion. Signed by District Judge Walter J. Gex III on October 24, 2008. (Gex, Kathleen)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER dismissing Biloxi Police Department sua sponte. Biloxi Police Department terminated as a Defendant in this cause. Signed by District Judge Walter J. Gex III on September 16, 2008. (Gex, Walter)
|
|
Filing
44
JUDGMENT incorporating the Memorandum Opinion 43 concerning Defendant Ocean Springs Police Department's [OSPD] motion 32 to dismiss, granting OSPD's motion and dismissing OSPD with prejudice, and further ordering that the parties shall bear their respective costs. Defendant OSPD terminated. Signed by District Judge Walter J. Gex III on September 4, 2008. (Gex, Kathleen)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
