Dedeaux v. State of Mississippi
Plaintiff: Abel J. Dedeaux
Defendant: State of Mississippi
Case Number: 1:2008cv00101
Filed: March 20, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Harrison
Presiding Judge: Louis Guirola
Presiding Judge: Robert H. Walker
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 15 FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL: Ordered that the Report and Recommendation is adopted in part and modified in part as the finding of this Court. The case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 10/27/08. (JCH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dedeaux v. State of Mississippi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Mississippi
Represented By: Jim Hood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Abel J. Dedeaux
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?