Previto v. Ryobi North America, Inc. et al
Gary Previto |
Ryobi North America, Inc., Ryobi Technologies, Inc., Ryobi Power Tool Co., Ryobi Electric Tools Mfg., Inc., Ryobi Limited, Techtronics, Inc., One World Technologies, Inc. and XYZ Corporation |
1:2008cv00177 |
May 2, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability Office |
Harrison |
Halil S. Ozerden |
John M. Roper |
Plaintiff |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 282 FINAL JUDGMENT: This matter has settled and is dismissed with prejudice as to all parties. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 2/2/11. (RLW) |
Filing 280 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 182 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 1/19/2011. (YSM) |
Filing 277 ORDER denying 176 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, granting 178 Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and dismissing Defendant Techtronics, Inc. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 1/14/2011. (YSM) |
Filing 274 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 262 Motion to Reconsider the Court's Order Striking Plaintiff's Supplemental Expert Designation of Dr. Gwen Cousins, and denying Alternative Relief. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 1/12/2011. (YSM) |
Filing 259 ORDER denying 225 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike One World's Supplemental Designation of Expert Witness. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 12/16/2010. (YSM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.