Raby v. Allison
Plaintiff: Stephan Brooks Raby
Defendant: David Allison
Case Number: 1:2008cv00279
Filed: July 1, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office
County: Pearl River
Presiding Judge: Halil S. Ozerden
Presiding Judge: John M. Roper
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 39 FINAL JUDGMENT: after a full review and consideration of the record, this civil action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Roper on 4/21/2009.(avm)
April 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Roper on 4/15/2009 (Regenold, Sheryal)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Raby v. Allison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephan Brooks Raby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Allison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?