Brown v. United Parcel Service, Incorporated
Plaintiff: Kenneth E. Brown
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Incorporated
Case Number: 1:2008cv00837
Filed: September 26, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Harrison
Presiding Judge: Louis Guirola
Presiding Judge: Robert H. Walker
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 42 JUDGMENT in favor of United Parcel Service, Incorporated against Kenneth E. Brown. Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. on 4/27/10. (RLW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. United Parcel Service, Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth E. Brown
Represented By: LaQuetta Maria Golden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?