Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Preston Hood Chevrolet, LLC
Plaintiff: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Defendant: Preston Hood Chevrolet, LLC
Case Number: 1:2008cv01265
Filed: September 30, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Harrison
Presiding Judge: Halil S. Ozerden
Presiding Judge: John M. Roper
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER denying Defendant's 6 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 8/13/2009. (YSM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Preston Hood Chevrolet, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Represented By: Maricia D. Woodham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Preston Hood Chevrolet, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?