Hoda v. Coventry Health Care Inc.
Plaintiff: Desmond Hoda
Defendant: Coventry Health Care Inc.
Case Number: 1:2008cv01313
Filed: October 8, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Hancock
Presiding Judge: Halil S. Ozerden
Presiding Judge: John M. Roper
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 29 FINAL JUDGMENT: Ordered that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant, coventry Health Care, Inc. are, and this civil action is, dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Halil S. Ozerden on 3/11/09. Cleared CJRA-P Flag. (RLW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hoda v. Coventry Health Care Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Desmond Hoda
Represented By: William E. Grubbs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Coventry Health Care Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?